Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Personal tools
Log in Register
Social justice and environmental video from the Asia Pacific
Sections
Personal tools
You are here: Home › Members › Nancy Mauro-Flude › Videos › 2.4 ghz porthole experiment




 

Donate

miro2gif

 

 
You are here: Home › Members › Nancy Mauro-Flude › Videos › 2.4 ghz porthole experiment
You are here: Home › Members › Nancy Mauro-Flude › Videos › 2.4 ghz porthole experiment
Document Actions

2.4 ghz porthole experiment

by Nancy Mauro-Flude — last modified May 10, 2012 08:14 AM
3.5
No rating set

PORTHOLE Experience - we designated portholes scanning with our 2.4 Ghz reciever that picked up wireless webcams surveiling public spaces - the 2.4 ghz frequency is the tiny fraction of the radio spectrum has been allocated for public use, [as if the eather were not already public!]

Embed
04:49
Genres
Categories
Keywords
Country
Language
Video information
Produced by na/
Directed by na/
Contact write the producer
Home page more info
Produced Mar 21, 2009
Distributor n/a

Full Description

PORTHOLE Experience
Michelle Teran, Nancy Mauro-Flude, Jaye Hays designated portholes scanning with our 2.4 Ghz reciever that picked up wireless webcams surveiling public spaces - the 2.4 ghz frequency is the tiny fraction of the radio spectrum has been allocated for public use, [as if the eather were not already public!]


4.min 49 seconds.



Copyright 2009, by the Contributing Authors. This work is licensed under a GNU Free Document License
adamg
adamg says:
Mar 25, 2009 05:51 AM
so the zooming and tracking is being done by someone else right?

did you choose footage that was specifically doing that? and what percentage more or less was actively controlled in this way?
Nancy
Nancy says:
Mar 25, 2009 07:08 AM
we were testing to see if it was an 'automated' surveilance system with motion capture or 'manned' the zooming at the end was after i had passed that space after the 6th hour in a row doing the same round. The 'watchers' the security of the Parliment House somehow knew we were tapping in to their feed - from the eratic searcing movements. We were hidden behind the bush they kept trying to zoom into. So no - none of it was actively controlled - by us -watching the watchers.
andrewl
andrewl says:
Mar 24, 2009 12:32 AM
nice one, i never knew you could do that!
Nancy
Nancy says:
Mar 24, 2009 12:46 AM
:)
Add comment

You can add a comment by filling out the form below. Plain text formatting. Web and email addresses are transformed into clickable links.

■